Home ▸ Other ▸ Why I hate: WWE Armageddon

This article is the 10th and final part of a series on WWE Pay Per View events.  See also:  Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, and Part 9.

Wow.  This is it, the end of this long series on WWE Pay Per View.  How fitting is it that it ends with Armageddon.  The last WWE Pay Per View of the year and the only one between Survivor Series and Royal Rumble.

I present my arguments against WWE Armageddon, after the jump!

Armageddon (December)

I’m sure Jeff Hardy will disagree with me after winning his first WWE Championship at Armageddon in 2008, but I don’t see any point of having a Pay Per View in the month of December.  Survivor Series is in November and the Royal Rumble is in January, you can use the entire month to build up feuds heading into the Rumble.  As cool of a name that Armageddon has, it’s got no purpose, other than to let the writers be lazy and not have to book more than a month ahead.

Look, if we really have to have a Pay Per View in December, why not get rid of Armageddon and replace it on PPV with Tribute to the Troops.  Those shows are always fun to watch, and you can donate the proceeds to a worthy cause.  I’d be more likely to order that than Armageddon.

Thanks for sticking around with us for the last 8 weeks, folks.  These articles were actually all written back in February, and timed so that the series would finish the week before WrestleMania 25.  I hope you enjoyed them, and we will see you next week – WrestleMania Sunday at Noon Eastern – for a special look at WrestleMania!

Like this post? Subscribe to our RSS Feed today and never miss another!